Domestic violence has been defined in the legal system as an occurrence or series of episodes involving physical violence perpetrated by a spouse or ex-partner. Laws addressing emotional ابتزاز, on the other hand, are less clear and inconsistent. In the judicial system, emotional abuse and blackmail are referred to as “coercive control.” Evan Stark used the phrase “coercive control” to describe the impact and harm caused by emotional abuse. He defines coercive control as a pattern of action that tries to deprive the victim of their liberty or freedom, as well as their sense of self, and is a violation of human rights. سايبر blackmail is a form of coercive control that is most commonly employed in close relationships. Read about Is Blackmailing a Crime
Laws governing coercive control
Laws governing coercive control (emotional blackmail) and abuse differ from country to country. Currently, there are no specific criminal statutes in place to protect victims of emotional or psychological abuse by a spouse in the United States. There are laws that exclusively protect partners from physical assault. Some states have sought to incorporate emotional abuse into laws against domestic violence, child abuse, and elder abuse.
Several nations are tackling psychological abuse in their legal systems. France was the first country to outlaw “psychological abuse inside marriage” in 2010.
Since 2015, coercive control has been classified as a felony in the United Kingdom. The Serious Crime Act of 2015 makes “controlling or coercive” behaviour toward another individual in an intimate or familial connection punishable by incarceration. Since the law’s implementation, an estimated 100 men have been convicted and punished for such offences.
The UK law states:
Coercive control is described as a pattern of conduct that progressively exerts power and control over another intimate partner. Controlling behaviour is defined by British law as “making a person subordinate and/or dependent by isolating them from sources of support, exploiting their resources and capacities for personal gain, depriving them of the means required for independence, resistance, and escape, and regulating their daily lives.” The legislation requires that charges be based on a pattern of actions rather than a single incident. The Domestic Violence Bill 2017 in Ireland also includes “coercive control” as a crime. Establishing criminal legislation addressing psychological abuse conveys a powerful cultural message that it will not be accepted in these countries. It offers a sense of protection and support to victims of such abuse. Because identifying physical abuse is easier, the question of how to prove coercive control or emotional abuse has been discussed. Those who oppose criminalising coercive control argue that the area is unclear and difficult to establish. Opponents argue that distinguishing jealousy, control, and emotional abuse is difficult to do and impossible to show in front of a jury or court. The issue was not brought to light until the impact of the abuser’s actions on the mental and physical health of the victims was thoroughly researched and assessed. More awareness leads to more support and movement in the criminal justice system. According to Stark, the lack of legislation addressing coercive control is a breach of human rights and a “liberty crime” against the victim. According to a survey performed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2010, nearly half of all women in the United States (48.4 percent) had encountered at least one type of psychological aggression by an intimate partner in their lifetimes. They witnessed coercive control, verbal violence, and furious gestures that were demeaning, insulting, dangerous, or humiliating in their partners. In the United States, there are organisations and organisations that advocate for policy change. Their goals are for the US legal system to acknowledge the harm caused by coercive control and implement criminal controls to rectify it.
Beyond criminal legislation, there are other avenues to follow in the legal system. Civil lawsuits can be initiated in some situations of emotional abuse. Victims or victims’ relatives can pursue emotional abuse claims based on deliberate infliction of emotional anguish.
Intentional imposition of mental distress is a tort based on behaviour that is so heinous that it causes the victim severe emotional anguish. Emotional distress claims are difficult to show and win, and they do not apply to ordinary rudeness or unpleasant behaviour in general. Instead, these situations emerge when the act is so heinous that the emotional consequences are genuine, long-lasting, and devastating.
Please share “Is Blackmailing a Crime?”